Today I spent about 3 hours trying to figure out a coherent git workflow for a team (spoiler: I don’t have it yet). I believe this “team git workflow” is properly called continuous integration.

I discussed the following approach with other web developers:

So let’s say I just cloned my team’s repo that has a master and dev branch. I’m in my terminal and locally I have a master and dev branch. I’m currently on dev. Does this git workflow make sense?

  • Locally, I create a new feature branch to implement a feature: git checkout -b feature
  • I implement the feature and commit: git add . git commit -m "implement feature"
  • I change to my local dev branch: git checkout dev
  • I pull changes from the remote dev branch in case a teammate pushed any changes: git pull origin dev (if there’s a merge conflict locally, I solve it)
  • I merge my feature branch into my dev branch: git merge feature
  • I push my dev branch to the remote repo’s dev branch: git push origin dev
  • Rinse and repeat

The response I got was of general approval with a couple of constructive remarks. The first and most pertinent one is that a Pull Request (PR) review should be implemented in the workflow. The other and less pertinent one is that the local merging of the develop and feature branches is unnecessary.

Anyway, I will share a few resources that helped me figure out the above workflow but, like I said, there’s a lot of room for improvement so take it with a grain of salt. I will update whenever I feel more confident with this dynamic.


  • This is the git workflow section from the Chingu Handbook with a few resources
  • The other one is this which I apply in my personal projects